|
Limbaugh's not that different from pro jocks
So I'm reading the New York Times Magazine piece on Rush Limbaugh and trying to figure out what's the difference between Limbaugh and the stereotypical professional athlete.
It was quite a struggle.
Don't get it twisted. I'm not some rabid Limbaugh hater. The man is an exquisite broadcaster and entertainer, arguably the best of all time. And I don't view Limbaugh as some sort of flaming bigot or sexist. He's a comedian. No different than Dave Chappelle or Richard Pryor. Must-read:Must-see:Top headlines:
Worth a thousand words:Limbaugh's short stint as an NFL broadcaster on ESPN didn't expose him as a racist. His comments about Donovan McNabb exposed Limbaugh as completely overmatched talking sports. He couldn't translate his outspoken, provocative views on race to the sports world. No, what has always fascinated me about Limbaugh is the way his followers view him beacon of American virtue and victim. I wonder how America's Dittoheads perceive, for instance, Barry Bonds, the Rush Limbaugh of baseball. And please, do not focus in on Bonds. He is not the point of this column. I simply used him as an example because of his unmatched talent and the fact that he can't find a baseball job due to a rather large bat-swing conspiracy. Now, Barry is no beacon of virtue or victim. Neither is Rush. He's the typical American man who followed his dream, worked extremely hard, caught the right breaks and achieved great fame and financial success. And, just like everyone else, Limbaugh's flaws were accentuated by fame and fortune. You see, that's what happens to professional athletes (and most celebrities). Like you, they're flawed before they ever make it big. Privilege and money allow them to reveal their inadequacies openly. They chase women who are too young, too easy and too unaccomplished to challenge them intellectually. They shower themselves with bling. They court public affection. And once they're busted, they attempt to conquer the demons that are public-relations nightmares.
I don't have any doubt that ClearChannel, Limbaugh's radio syndicator, fought aggressively before giving its radio star a $400 million contract. Limbaugh surely employs the Scott Boras of radio and counter-punched spiritedly throughout the negotiations. Unlike professional sports, we were not privy to the contract haggling. We have no idea if Limbaugh took his shirt off and did sit-ups in his driveway. Columnists and radio talk-show hosts did not pontificate on Limbaugh's level of greed. Callers did not flood talk shows complaining that it's ridiculous to pay a broadcaster $400 million. Rush Limbaugh will never go across the middle and face Ray Lewis. Limbaugh's most difficult opponent is pillowy-soft Al Sharpton. I'd rather confront Shallow Al than Ray Ray. It infuriates me when I hear someone argue that athletes are overpaid. Compared to what other profession? Teachers? Yes. Entertainers? Hell no. It also infuriates me when someone states that white men such as Limbaugh and Imus pay a terrible price for discussing race in politically incorrect fashion. What a joke. They're paid handsomely to talk about race in a controversial way. Limbaugh has more in common with Barry Bonds, Alex Rodriquez, Shaquille O'Neal, Terrell Owens, Dave Chappelle, Al Sharpton and yours truly than he does with his 20 million Dittoheads. |
![]() Watch highlights of LSU's 38-24 win over Ohio State in the 2008 BCS Championship game. More BCSFootball Video • Tigers too tough in Bayou • Hester, Perrilloux discuss win • BCS Trophy Presentation • Dorsey and Favorite, D-Line ecstasy • Early Favorites, LSU takes title • Buckeyes can't hang with SEC • BCS Live: Bowl breakdown • BCS Live: Charissa in the Big Easy • BCS Live: Booty about town • Orange Bowl Trophy Presentation |
| 2006 COPYRIGHTS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © BOWL CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES / SITE BUILT BY FOXSPORTS.COM / PRIVACY POLICY / TERMS OF USE / CONTACT | ||